The NYT article on the United Auto Workers' negotiations with GM, Ford, and Chrysler included a quote from a history professor, comparing the problem of paying for retiree health care benefits with the problem of Social Security: too few workers and too many retirees.
Fire that professor. This is not the story with either. The problem with paying for health care is the explosion of health care costs over the last three decades. No one anticipated that health care costs could run $15,000 to $20,000 per year per retiree thirty years ago. That's the reason that there is no equivalent to the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation for health care benefits -- health care costs were not a big deal 35 years ago when the PBGC was established.
We can cover the cost of an increase in the ratio of retirees to workers in both the auto industry and Social Security (we've been living with a rising ratio for 7 decades). We can't cover the cost of a broken health care system.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved