Readers of the Wall Street Journal might think so. The WSJ reports that the agreement that GM just signed with the UAW will allow it to hire new workers in non-core positions where they will "get paid about half or less of the $70-to-$75 an hour wage-and-benefit package traditionally given UAW members."
The problem with this statement is that much of this $70-$75 hour calculation refers to the legacy costs for retired workers. These are fixed costs that GM owes regardless of how many workers they currently employ. For bookkeeping and PR purposes it may be helpful to average these legacy costs over the hours worked by the current workforce, but the calculation does not reflect the money actually paid as wages and benefits to these workers.
Presumably GM will be paying its new workers less than the workers they replace, but the difference will not be $75,000 a year per worker. Hopefully GM has a better grip on these numbers than the WSJ.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
