The NYT has a column this morning that makes the true point that the cheapest way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is to pay developing countries not to pollute. The problem is that basic argument is not right and the proposed solution is inadequate.
The problem with the basic argument is that China's economy is not hugely inefficient in energy terms as the article claims. China's GDP is almost 80 prercent of the size of the U.S. economy, not one third the size, as the column claims. This means that it should not be surprising that China may soon pass the U.S. in greenhouse gas emissions.
The other problem is that the mechanism for paying for reductions he proposes is not likely to accomplish much. As has already been shown with other projects, it is easy to game single project reductions and very expensive to monitor the process in any case. It would make far more sense to provide China a generous emissions target (comparable to its baseline growth) along the lines of the Kyoto agreement, and the allow it to see permits to other countries (who would get more stringent targets than they have at present). This would make a more efficient and enforceable system.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
