Did Bush Goose Defense Spending for Political Reasons?

by

I am very reluctant to believe that a U.S. president would time defense spending for political purposes, but it is hard to explain the 18.1 percent jump in the third quarter in any other way. Over the last 40 years, this increase is exceeded only by a 36.3 percent jump in the 2nd quarter of 2003 (the Iraq War) and an 18.2 percent rise in the fourth quarter of 1984, at the height of Reagan's military buildup. At a time when we are supposed to be de-surging in Iraq, it is difficult to identify any events in the world that would warrant such a large jump in military spending. The increase in defense spending added 0.86 percentage points to GDP growth for the quarter. In other words, GDP would have fallen at a 1.2 percent annual rate in the absence of the leap in defense spending. One of the reasons that I didn't think that President Bush (or any other president) would manipulate defense spending for political purposes is that I assumed that such an unusual jump would draw attention from the media. I was wrong. This peculiar leap in defense spending was almost completely ignored in the coverage of the GDP report.

--Dean Baker

I’m writing to you today with a sense of urgency that I haven’t felt since I began my journalism career. As executive editor of The American Prospect, I’ve witnessed firsthand how independent journalism serves as a crucial bulwark against the erosion of our democratic institutions. Today, that role is more vital than ever. Can you step up today and show your support?

The winds of authoritarianism are blowing stronger. We’re seeing alarming signs of a coordinated effort to silence critical voices and undermine the very foundations that support progressive causes. As Bob Kuttner presciently wrote in our August 2024 issue, a weaponized IRS could attack the very foundations of the progressive movement. We need readers to step up and help us dig in for the long haul.

We’re falling behind in our spring fundraising campaign, and with so much at stake we can’t afford to come up short. If you value fearless, independent journalism that holds the powerful accountable and defends democracy, now is the time to step up. The American Prospect depends on reader support to stay in the fight. Pitch in today and help us close the gap. Please consider making a donation today.

–David Dayen, Executive Editor