That point seemed to be missing from an otherwise worthwhile discussion of the issue in the Post. This point is important to understanding its potential consequences.
For example, if a plan just slipped over the $23,000 threshold, say to $23,500, then the tax would only apply to the $500 over the threshold. Applying the 40 percent tax rate, this implies a tax of $200, which is equal to 0.8 percent of the cost of the plan. It is unlikely that this would lead to major changes in policies. Over time, as costs continued to rise, there would be more pressure to keep the price of the plan down as the tax would have more consequence, but just crossing the tax threshold by a small amount is not a big deal.
The American Prospect is nonprofit, reader-funded journalism—and we need your help.
Our reporters dig deep, hold power to account, and explain how policy shapes people’s lives. If you value independent journalism that goes beyond the headlines, now’s the time to support it.
Here’s how you can help: • Donate to power fearless reporting
• Subscribe to get our print magazine 6x/year.
