Not according to USA Today. It told readers that: "the key reason is that lawmakers are fearful that tough pay curbs might get in the way of the financial services industry helping foster an economic recovery."
It's not clear how USA Today was able to make this determination. In the event that members of Congress actually were trying to benefit their Wall Street contributors it is unlikely that they would give the contributions as a reason for their action. As a practical matter, it it highly unlikely that anything Congress did by way of restricting compensation at the banks would have a significant impact on the recovery. Presumably members of Congress know this, so concern for the economy is not a plausible explanation for the failure to restrict executive compensation.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2024 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved