Reporters generally think it's their job to just report what the major actors in a political debate say, but do they also have a responsibility to point out when the comments are absurd? In the debate over Representative Barney Frank's bill requiring companies to have non-binding shareholder votes on CEO compensation, some of the opposing comments definitely fit into "the Martians are coming" category.
According to the NYT, Representative Spencer Bachus complained that with this bill Congress would be substituting "its judgment for the American people." When Congress gives shareholders a vote on CEO pay, how is it substituting its judgment for the American people? It sounds like its giving the judgment to the American people instead of corporate insiders.
Pete Sessions, another opponent of the bill seemed to inadvertently make exactly this point , �This provides outsiders such as big labor bosses, environmentalists and so-called consumer activists the ability to compel boards to do their bidding.� Of course none of these villains gets any voice unless they are shareholders in the company. So, Mr Sessions is arguing against giving shareholders a voice in running the companies they own.
I know the reporters don't want to editorialize, but it might be worth getting some neutral commentator to point out that the comments from opponents of the Frank bill don't make sense.
I’m writing to you today with a sense of urgency that I haven’t felt since I began my journalism career. As executive editor of The American Prospect, I’ve witnessed firsthand how independent journalism serves as a crucial bulwark against the erosion of our democratic institutions. Today, that role is more vital than ever. Can you step up today and show your support?
The winds of authoritarianism are blowing stronger. We’re seeing alarming signs of a coordinated effort to silence critical voices and undermine the very foundations that support progressive causes. As Bob Kuttner presciently wrote in our August 2024 issue, a weaponized IRS could attack the very foundations of the progressive movement. We need readers to step up and help us dig in for the long haul.
We’re falling behind in our spring fundraising campaign, and with so much at stake we can’t afford to come up short. If you value fearless, independent journalism that holds the powerful accountable and defends democracy, now is the time to step up. The American Prospect depends on reader support to stay in the fight. Pitch in today and help us close the gap. Please consider making a donation today.
–David Dayen, Executive Editor
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved
