The NYT ran a piece showing the decline in earmarks in spending bills over the last three years. The article shows the dollar value of earmarks fell by more than 10 percent from 2005 to 2008. It would have been useful to compare the value of earmarks to GDP. Since nominal GDP rose by more than 15 percent over this period, the value of earmarks relative to GDP fell by more than 25 percent over this period.
It also would have been worth mentioning that the total value of earmarks for 2008 is projected to be less than $17 billion, approximately 0.5 percent of total spending. Even if earmarks were eliminated entirely, it would not have a very large impact on the budget.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
