The WSJ ended a 3-part series on the demise of Bear Stearns with a discussion of the buyout engineered by the Fed. It poses the issue confronting the Fed in engineering the buyout and the guarantees to other investment banks and their creditors as one of creating moral hazard versus financial collapse.
These were not the only choices. The Fed could have imposed conditions for its assistance. For example, it could have limited its guarantees and access to the discount window to investment banks that capped executive compensation at $2 million a year. This would have meant that taxpayers would not have to directly subsidize the incomes of the richest people in the country, as they are now doing as a result of the Fed's actions.
Unlike many news organizations, the Prospect has remained staunchly committed to keeping our journalism free and accessible to all. We believe that independent journalism is crucial for a functioning democracy—but quality reporting comes at a cost. From Trump’s threat to the free press to Musk’s influence on our democracy, there is too much at stake in 2025 to stop now.
We’re behind on our goal to raise $75,000 to continue delivering the hard-hitting investigative journalism you’ve come to expect from us. Your support helps us maintain our independence and dig deeper into the stories that matter most.
We need you to make a year-end contribution today. Any amount helps secure our future and ensure we can continue holding power to account.
