The WSJ ended a 3-part series on the demise of Bear Stearns with a discussion of the buyout engineered by the Fed. It poses the issue confronting the Fed in engineering the buyout and the guarantees to other investment banks and their creditors as one of creating moral hazard versus financial collapse.
These were not the only choices. The Fed could have imposed conditions for its assistance. For example, it could have limited its guarantees and access to the discount window to investment banks that capped executive compensation at $2 million a year. This would have meant that taxpayers would not have to directly subsidize the incomes of the richest people in the country, as they are now doing as a result of the Fed's actions.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. Any amount you give today will help sustain this crucial work.