That is no doubt how the Washington Post would report the debate over a bill that authorized dog abuse as a way of lowering energy prices. The Post would carefully present the statements of support or opposition to such a bill. It would not bother to point out that kicking dogs actually will not lower oil prices, just as the Post will not report that drilling offshore will not lower oil prices. What possible relevance could that have for readers?
--Dean Baker
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. This month, we're trying to raise $50,000 to help fuel our election coverage, and we've fallen behind on reaching our goal. Any amount you give today will bring us closer to making our reporting possible—and a generous donor has agreed to match all online donations, so your impact will be doubled.
You can help power this newsroom by making a donation today.
