How many NYT readers know how much the government is projected to spend over the next decade? How many know how large the economy is projected to be?
The paper has a well-educated readership, but my guess is that the answer to both questions would be less than 1.0 percent. This raises the question of why the NYT gives a set of spending figures on Baucus health care bill that will be virtually meaningless to nearly everyone who reads it. It would be very simple to make these numbers meaningful by either expressing them as share of the budget or as per person expenditures. ($800 billion over the course of a decade comes to about $350 per person per year.)
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved