The Environmental Protection Agency ruled that California and 16 other states could not set their own emission standards for cars sold in their states. In its article reporting this decision, the NYT quoted EPA administrator Stephan L. Johnson saying "the Bush administration is moving forward with a clear national solution, not a confusing patchwork of state rules."
It would have been helpful to readers to point out what this "confusing patchwork of state rules would imply." The state rules would set mileage standards that are higher than the national level for the mix of cars sold in the affected states. An auto manufacturer could adjust its mix of cars sold in each state in order to meet whatever target is set. This process can be managed easily with an Excel spreadsheet. It is not clear why any auto manufacturer would find this process confusing.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.