The NYT has an article about recent changes in Turkey's society and economy in which it asserts that "the economy has nearly doubled in the four years that the AK [the ruling Islamic party] has been in power, largely because it has stuck to an economic program prescribed by the International Monetary Fund."
According to the OECD's data, in 2003, 2004, and 2005, Turkey's economy grew 5.8 percent, 8.9 percent, and 7.4 percent, respectively. Clicking over to the CIA Factbook, I find an estimate of 5.2 percent growth for 2006. That gives a cumulative total of 30.2 percent growth over the last four years. That's pretty good, but quite far from "nearly doubled" in normal usage.
So, this raises the obvious question: does the IMF use a language in which "nearly doubled" is consistent with 30.2 percent growth? If so, that would explain why many of its critics have had complaints with the institution.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved