I almost let this one slide with all the nonsense about the housing market meltdown. The NYT ran an editorial this week discussing the drug Cerezyme, which is used to treat Gaucher disease. Genzyme, the manufacturer of the drug, charges $300,000 for a year's dosage.
The editorial missed the key point: the drug does not "cost" $300,000 a year to produce. Most likely it costs no more than a few hundred dollars. The issue is the cost of the research necessary to develop the drug. The absurdity of charging patients $300,000 a year for a drug that is needed for life or health only arises because of the perverse way in which the government finances medical research.
The editorial should be looking to alternatives to patent monopolies for financing drug research. If the research had been paid for upfront and the drug was sold for in a competitive market, the NYT would not be wasted ink writing about problems affording it.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2024 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved