The WSJ tells us that "economists are giving up on the idea that the U.S. housing slump will be quick and relatively painless." It is good to see that economists' forecasts are moving closer to reality.
However, the question remains why did so many economists fail to recognize the severity of the housing slump (they are still seriously underestimating it)? And, the important question for the WSJ and other major media outlets is why do they rely almost exclusively on economists who were wrong as sources for their articles on the topic?
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved
