Washington Post columnist Steven Pearlstein gets much of the story right in his column on electricity deregulation, although he is too generous to its proponents. Deregulation can perhaps best be seen as a case of consumer fraud concealed as "free market" ideology.
The basic story is that the existing regulatory structure had locked in a cross-subsidy with big industrial users paying more than the cost of providing them with electricity, thereby subsidizing residential and small business users who paid less than cost. In standard economic models, eliminating this sort of cross-subsidy will increase economic efficiency, although it will also redistribute income from resiential users and small businesses, who will pay higher prices, to large industrial users, who will pay lower prices.
That may be good policy, but it was preposterous to sell deregulation as benefitting typical residential users, which is exactly what proponents did. In fact, they managed to pull off an even bigger scam when they got low-cost states like Montana (cheap hydropower) to deregulate and let their prices rise to regional levels.
In response to the chaos and undersupply resulting from a deregulated market (there is little incentive to build idle excess capacity, which leads to shortages at peak demand) most states have turned to long-term contracts with utilities. This is essentially the same thing as regulation, but it makes the "free-marker" types feel better.
I’m writing to you today with a sense of urgency that I haven’t felt since I began my journalism career. As executive editor of The American Prospect, I’ve witnessed firsthand how independent journalism serves as a crucial bulwark against the erosion of our democratic institutions. Today, that role is more vital than ever. Can you step up today and show your support?
The winds of authoritarianism are blowing stronger. We’re seeing alarming signs of a coordinated effort to silence critical voices and undermine the very foundations that support progressive causes. As Bob Kuttner presciently wrote in our August 2024 issue, a weaponized IRS could attack the very foundations of the progressive movement. We need readers to step up and help us dig in for the long haul.
We’re falling behind in our spring fundraising campaign, and with so much at stake we can’t afford to come up short. If you value fearless, independent journalism that holds the powerful accountable and defends democracy, now is the time to step up. The American Prospect depends on reader support to stay in the fight. Pitch in today and help us close the gap. Please consider making a donation today.
–David Dayen, Executive Editor
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved