That's what USA Today told readers. It would be interesting if the article explained to readers how it made this determination.
In fact it seems rather evident that the over-valued dollar was a main cause of the country's economic ills. The high dollar is the main cause of a trade deficit that approached $800 billion, or 6 percent of GDP, in 2006. It has cost the country millions of relatively high paying manufacturing jobs, putting downward pressure on the wages of workers without high school degrees.
The trade deficits of recent years were not sustainable. (They were two to three times the size of the budget deficit over the last three years.) The only way to bring the trade deficit down on a sustained basis is by reducing the value of the dollar. This is a necessary adjustment, not a "symptom of U.S. economic ills."
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
