The NYT uses the term "free trade" three times in an article about President Bush's tour of Latin America. Do they pay reporters by the word? Once again, "trade" is more accurate and saves space, trees, and energy. Doesn't the NYT know about global warming?
--Dean Baker
The American Prospect depends on reader support
If you are scraping by right now, please don’t give us anything. But if you have the ability to support independent, non-profit journalism, we are so grateful. Your voluntary contribution helps keep this website paywall-free. You can sign up as a subscriber with a range of benefits, including an opt-in to receive the print magazine by mail.
