David Cho has a generally good front page article in the Post today on the increased concentration in the banking industry as a result of the crisis. It would have benefited from some voices who are critical of the Obama administration's plans for regulating "too big to fail" institutions.
As the article correctly explains, too big too fail banks get subsidized by the government, since lenders know that their loans are effectively insured by the government. This allows these banks to borrow at a lower cost, giving them an enormous advantage over their competitors. The article quotes Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner's explanation of the Obama administration's plans to offset this advantage with increased capital requirements.
It is questionable whether these restrictions will be efficient. The most obvious test of the effectiveness of such restrictions would be if banks voluntarily break up to avoid them. In principle, the restrictions should be sufficiently onerous that they would eliminate any benefit from a bank achieving "too big to fail" status. Therefore, at least some banks in this category should find it beneficial to break up into smaller banks to avoid the restrictions. If the Obama administrations proposals are put in place, we will have the opportunity to see if the restrictions pass this test.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
