The Washington Post had an editorial on immigration today telling readers that "immigration equals growth." Well, duh, other things equal, if immigration increases the U.S. workforce by 10 percent, it would be really amazing if it didn't increase GDP by at least a little.
The questions that serious people would ask is whether it increases per capita GDP (India is richer than Germany in terms of having a larger GDP, its per capita GDP is less than one quarter the size), and how the gains are distributed.
The serious economic argument against the current pattern of immigration (in my view) is that it tends to lower the wages of low and moderate income workers. We can redirect immigration to favor the entrance of high-end workers which would lower wages of doctors, lawyers, economists and people who write for the Washington Post. (The proposed legislation takes modest steps in this direction.) This would produce large gains for the economy (lower prices for health care and other services provided by highly paid professionals) and greater equality.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
