The NYT discusses the extent to which the United States will be pursuing industrial policy in its efforts to reinvigorate the Big Three. The article implies that industrial policy is somehow alien to the United States. In fact, the United States has long had implicit industrial policy.
In the early part of the 20th century the United States had some of the highest tariffs in the world with the explicit goal of developing domestic industry. In the post-World War II era, the government adopted a variety of policies with the explicit purpose of promoting the pattern of suburban growth that fueled the economy for the last 60 years. This included a variety of subsidies for home ownership and the construction of the highways. (Low-interest mortgages to veterans are an often overlooked subsidy. Until the end of the draft in the 70s, nearly all men served in the military and therefore qualified for veterans mortgages.)
In short, industrial policy would not be new to the U.S. economy, even if an explicit discussion of it might be.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
