The NYT reports that the Republicans in the Senate are insisting on $8.3 billion in tax cuts as their price for allowing an increase in the minimum wage. The article commits the common sin of not telling readers the time period over which these cuts will take place or providing any context that would allow them to assess its importance.
This projected cost is for a 10-year period. It's equal to about 0.03 percent of projected spending. It's not a huge deal in terms of the budget, but most of the tax cuts in this bill probably would not be approved by Congress if they were not attached to such a popular measure. In this way, they are like most earmarks.
Unlike many news organizations, the Prospect has remained staunchly committed to keeping our journalism free and accessible to all. We believe that independent journalism is crucial for a functioning democracy—but quality reporting comes at a cost.
This year, we’re aiming to raise $75,000 to continue delivering the hard-hitting investigative journalism you’ve come to expect from us. Your support helps us maintain our independence and dig deeper into the stories that matter most.
If you value our reporting, please consider making a contribution today. Any amount helps secure our future and ensure we can continue holding power to account.
