The NYT reports that the Republicans in the Senate are insisting on $8.3 billion in tax cuts as their price for allowing an increase in the minimum wage. The article commits the common sin of not telling readers the time period over which these cuts will take place or providing any context that would allow them to assess its importance.
This projected cost is for a 10-year period. It's equal to about 0.03 percent of projected spending. It's not a huge deal in terms of the budget, but most of the tax cuts in this bill probably would not be approved by Congress if they were not attached to such a popular measure. In this way, they are like most earmarks.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. This month, we're trying to raise $50,000 to help fuel our election coverage, and a generous donor has agreed to match all online donations. Any amount you give will help us deliver the high-quality coverage you expect from us this election.
