The NYT reports on proposals to support the municipal bond market. At one point the article refers to a proposal by Representative Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, to reinsure $50 billion of municipal bonds. The article then asserts about this other proposals: "All of the proposals are meant to help struggling state and local governments that are facing a cash-flow squeeze."
Actually, Mr. Frank's intention in this proposal is not clear. Guarantees for newly issued bonds will reduce the interest rates that state and local governments must pay. However, once these bonds are issued, state and local governments are not directly affected by the price of these bonds. Reinsuring bonds that have already been issued will increase the value of these bonds, thereby helping bondholders, but will provide no obvious benefit for struggling state and local governments that are facing a cash-flow squeeze.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.