This article reports the results of the search for intelligent life at Freddie Mac, evidence that people did warn the highly paid CEO Bill Syron that the company was getting into trouble. It notes several warnings that were ignored by Mr. Syron. This is what newspapers are supposed to do.
The article does have important error. It notes that both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were unprepared for a nationwide decline in housing prices, which was of course an entirely predictable event to people who understood the housing market, which should include the management at these companies.
It then comments that: "the only real protection against such a downfall was purchasing only the safest loans." Actually, this would not have provided protection either because even safe loans default at much higher rates in a downturn, substantially reducing their value.
The only real protection would have been to stop lending in areas where housing appeared to be substantially over-valued, which would have been most of the country. Fannie and Freddie would have faced enormous political pressure if they had gone this route, but people who are paid 8-figure salaries are supposed to be able to make tough decisions. If Fannie and Freddie had cut the supply of credit, it would have burst the bubble at a much earlier date, limiting the harm to the economy.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
