Suppose your boss told you that you were getting a big pay increase. After spending the night celebrating, you find out that the your pay increase was coming in the form of higher health care benefits for people who used to work at your office.
That could happen if your boss was the New York Times. It tells readers today that the United Auto Workers have agreed with Ford to accept a cut in hourly compensation from $60 an hour to $55 an hour, bringing their compensation closer in line with the $49 an hour paid by Toyota and other foreign manufacturers. It is only in the fourth paragraph that the NYT tells readers that this figures includes the cost of health care benefits to retired workers.
It would be helpful if the NYT and other media outlets would revert to normal English usage in discussing the compensation of auto workers. Ford is welcome to keep their books anyway they like, but payments that do not go in any form to current workers, like the cost of retiree health benefits, do not fit the definition of compensation. UAW auto workers are reasonably well-paid, but their compensation package is not as generous as this measure of "compensation" implies.
Since support for the automobile industry is a major political issue, it would be helpful if the media would try to present accurate information to readers on workers' compensation.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.