I hate to be rude, but after seeing endless new stories repeat the inaccurate claim that the compensation of UAW members is $70 an hour, it is striking that a news story on the closing of Washington news bureaus never discusses reporters' pay. If workers are losing their job, wouldn't the normal assumption be that their pay is higher than the market will bear? That is certainly how the loss of jobs in the auto industry and other manufacturing sectors is treated. Why is it different for journalists?
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved