The NYT told readers that China's central bank is raising reserve requirements rather than the central bank lending rate because it is worried that if raised its lending rate, the higher interest rates would pull more foreign money into the economy. This explanation does not make sense because raising reserve requirements would also lead to higher interest rates.
The mechanism is very simple. Higher reserve requirements reduce the supply of money. A lower supply leads to higher interest rates.
The article also asserted that the Federal Reserve Board signaled that it would raise its interest rates in months, based on strong growth. It certainly is not clear that the Fed has plans to raise interest rates any time soon, although it has not explicitly ruled out this possibility.
It is worth noting that the 5.7 percent growth rate was driven mostly by inventories. Final demand likely grew by less than 2.0 percent after recent revisions to data are incorporated. Few economists are projecting strong growth for the U.S. in 2010.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
