That is presumably the meaning of the statement about the "federal government's deepening fiscal difficulties." The New York Times may not like the current level of government spending or deficit, but that is the view of the reporter or the editor. It is not an objective fact that the government has "deepening fiscal difficulties."
In fact, the government can borrow long-term money at far lower cost than at any point in the last 50 years. The financial markets obviously do not agree with the NYT's assessment of the government's fiscal situation.
The most obvious effect of reducing the budget deficit right now would be to raise the unemployment rate, slow economic growth, and lower investment, thereby leaving a less productive economy for our children and grandchildren. While some deficit reduction cults may view this as a positive economic path, there are not many economists who would agree with this position.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. Any amount you give today will help sustain this crucial work.