That is presumably the meaning of the statement about the "federal government's deepening fiscal difficulties." The New York Times may not like the current level of government spending or deficit, but that is the view of the reporter or the editor. It is not an objective fact that the government has "deepening fiscal difficulties."
In fact, the government can borrow long-term money at far lower cost than at any point in the last 50 years. The financial markets obviously do not agree with the NYT's assessment of the government's fiscal situation.
The most obvious effect of reducing the budget deficit right now would be to raise the unemployment rate, slow economic growth, and lower investment, thereby leaving a less productive economy for our children and grandchildren. While some deficit reduction cults may view this as a positive economic path, there are not many economists who would agree with this position.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved