Apparently not, since an NYT article on the budget quoted two people from the Concord Coalition and no one else. It would be helpful to readers if the NYT did not rely exclusively on people who believe that reducing budget deficits is the most important economic priority in its reporting.
Had it turned to a broader group of experts, the NYT could have told readers that the only reason that there is a major budget problem projected for the long-term is that U.S. health care costs are out of control. If we can successfully contain costs through health care reform, then the long-term budget problem promoted by the Concord Coalition crew will not exist.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. This month, we're trying to raise $50,000 to help fuel our election coverage, and we've fallen behind on reaching our goal. Any amount you give today will bring us closer to making our reporting possible—and a generous donor has agreed to match all online donations, so your impact will be doubled.
