For years the media liked to tout the fact that Europe had a higher unemployment rate than the United States. This was routinely presented as evidence that Europe's more generous welfare states and strong labor movements were outmoded in a modern economy. This story lost credibility as the unemployment rates have converged over the last few years, and in recent months U.S. unemployment exceeded Europe's levels.
Now, the media are ridiculing Europe's efforts to reduce its unemployment rate. The NYT complains that companies are reducing hours rather than laying off workers, among other steps. In fact, this would be a really great way to deal with demand shortfalls. If hours were cut back every time demand fell off, then we could avoid subjecting millions of people (tens of millions in the current downturn) to forced unemployment or underemployment. In the U.S. economy, a 5 percent reduction in average work hours could save roughly 7 million jobs.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. This month, we're trying to raise $50,000 to help fuel our election coverage, and a generous donor has agreed to match all online donations. Any amount you give will help us deliver the high-quality coverage you expect from us this election.
