When GM sold off its Delphi parts division, it made a series of commitments to its unions, including that it would stand behind its pension obligations. The fact that these commitments are being honored has angered the NYT. It featured an article pointing out that union workers, who had these commitments, are doing better than non-union workers who did not have these commitments.
This is similar to the situation in which executives, who were promised large pensions, tend to collect more money in retirement than ordinary workers, who did not contract for large pensions. That may not be fair, but that is the way that contracts work. It should not be news to the NYT.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
