Suppose I place a bet on a tech start-up with the government lending me much of the money and guaranteeing me against losing most of my money. If the stock shoots up, then I have made money due to my impressive investing skills, right?
That's what the NYT tells readers in an effort to garner support for hedge fund managers who might feel harassed by Congress if they take part in the latest Fed-Treasury proposal to increase the flow of credit in the economy.
This discussion is more than a bit bizarre. The proposal offers investors much larger potential returns than they could get buying the same assets without government subsidies and it protects them against most potential losses. Naturally hedge fund managers would like to get this generous taxpayer subsidy without conditions (how does this compare with auto workers' compensation?), but why would anyone expect the government to give handouts with no conditions to some of the richest people in the country?
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved
