The NYT takes President Roosevelt to task for not being willing to fully embrace Keynesian economics and therefore failing to restore the economy to full employment with his New Deal programs. The complaint is fair, but Roosevelt did better than the article leads readers to believe.
The standard measures of the unemployment rate counting people employed under government programs like the Works Progress Administration as being unemployed. If these people are instead counted as being employed (in keeping with current methodology) then the unemployment rate fell below 10 percent in 1937, before Roosevelt became concerned about budget deficits and cut spending and raised taxes. This is still far from full employment, but it is less than half the 23 percent rate that Roosevelt faced when he took office.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved
