The NYT notes the current deficit problems and asks "How, for example, will the next president rein in the cost of retirement and health programs?" The better question is why should the next president rein in the cost of retirement programs?
The Congressional Budget Office's projections show that the main government retirement program will be fully funded for almost thirty years after the latest date that the next president can leave office, so why should the next president be reining in the cost, because the NYT wants it to?
It would be equally sensible to ask how will the next president rein in the cost of interest payments on the national debt. The next president could have a partial default on the national debt to accomplish this task. Since workers have already paid the Social Security taxes to fund their retirement far into the future, the NYT implicitly wants the federal government to default on the bonds held by the Social Security trust fund (the implication of "reining in the cost" of Social Security). If the NYT wants default on these bonds to be on the national agenda, then there is no obvious reason that default on government bonds more generally should not be on the national agenda.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
