The Post misinformed readers this morning by telling them that the 10.2 percent unemployment rate reported for October was a: "was a reminder of how far off they were in their early predictions about the impact of the stimulus bill passed earlier this year."
Actually, the Obama administration, like CBO and most private forecasters, underestimated the severity of the downturn. There is no credible evidence that overestimated the effectiveness of the stimulus. In other words, there is no evidence (or even a credible story) that the unemployment rate would be lower if without the stimulus. There is also no reason to question the fact that the stimulus did in fact lower the unemployment rate by roughly the amount predicted by the Obama administration.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved