"I'm for cutting costs where it makes sense. ... If the net effect is destroying thousands of good-paying jobs, then that's a different story. Cut the fat, yes, but when it gets to the bone, that's something else." Those were the words of Indiana Senator Evan Bayh in the context of arguing against placing any sort of tax on the medical device industry.
Of course this statement is absurd. The most extreme forms of waste often involve good-paying jobs. For example, the pharmaceutical industry, the defense industry, and the financial industry all offer good-paying jobs to many people. They can do this because they take large amounts of money from the rest of the population. The fact that an industry has good-paying jobs is hardly evidence that it is not wasteful.
Rather than ending the article this way, the Post should have presented the comments of anyone familiar with economics, who could have ridiculed Bayh, a senator who pretends to be a fiscal conservative.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. This month, we're trying to raise $50,000 to help fuel our election coverage, and we've fallen behind on reaching our goal. Any amount you give today will bring us closer to making our reporting possible—and a generous donor has agreed to match all online donations, so your impact will be doubled.
