That is effectively what Mr. Paulson was quoted as saying in an NYT article today. He was asked about the generous terms for his bailout, which will give the nation's nine largest banks close to $80 billion in subsidies over the next five years. Paulson rejected the idea that he could have demanded market terms for the government's investments in the banks: "I could not see the United States doing things like putting in capital on a punitive basis that hurts investors."
It would have been appropriate to highlight this comment and perhaps even devote a separate article to it. Secretary Paulson has repeatedly condemned protectionism and warned how it can hurt the economy. There is no economic theory that shows that the economic distortions created by subsidies for major U.S. banks are any less harmful than subsidies for any other industry.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved