Max Baucus, the head of the Senate Finance Committee, has explicitly and publicly said that universal Medicare was never considered as a possible health care reform option. When the committee held hearings on reform, no one supporting universal Medicare was allowed to testify, even though this is the only health reform option that has any sort of grassroots support.
There are reasons why universal Medicare would be difficult to pass politically, but the Washington Post's description of Baucus's approach to reform:
"his approach has been to pull together stakeholders and hold them as long as possible; no idea is ruled out, no policy change dismissed,"
is simply not true. Since Baucus has not been willing to consider universal Medicare and it is incredibly bad reporting for the Post to tell readers, in a major front page story, that "no idea is been ruled out" when this is clearly not true.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
