It seems they still haven't gotten the word. The paper had a front page piece on how some consumers are returning to shopping again after staying away for the last six months. While the article includes some comments on consumer psychology, there is no discussion of the fact that consumers have lost close to $6 trillion in housing wealth over the last three years. This would be the primary cause of the falloff in consumption/ rise in saving rates.
At one point, the article refers to the rebound of the stock market as one reason that people might be returning to spending. It is unlikely that this would be a major factor for many consumers. According to the Federal Reserve Board, three quarters of families had less than $35k in the stock market (including retirement accounts) in 2007. Given the relatively small amount that most families have in the market it is unlikely that even large fluctuations in prices would have much impact on the consumption of most families.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. This month, we're trying to raise $50,000 to help fuel our election coverage, and we've fallen behind on reaching our goal. Any amount you give today will bring us closer to making our reporting possible—and a generous donor has agreed to match all online donations, so your impact will be doubled.
