When the President or any prominent politician makes an absurd statement, the media have an obligation to all public attention to it. Is the person either completely uninformed about the topic or are they just lying to advance their agenda.
This is how the media should have reported the assertion by President Bush, reported in the NYT this morning, that plans by Senators Obama and Clinton to renegotiate NAFTA if elected president could "shut down trade" (NYT words, not necessarily Bush words).
While Mexico and Canada may be unhappy over any efforts to renegotiate NAFTA, it is absurd to think that they would stop their trade with the United States in response. Such a halt would be devastating to their economies. The NYT should have sought to press President Bush or his press staff to determine whether he really believes something so ridiculous or whether he was just making up a scare story to score political points.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. Any amount you give today will help sustain this crucial work.