Spurred by continuing confusion over the extent to which weak wage growth can be blamed on upward redistribution to profits and high end wage earners, I decided to do a quick accounting exercise to lay out the basic numbers. Using total economy productivity (instead of non-farm business sector), and adjust for the gap between gross output and net output, and the difference between inflation rates measured with a consumption deflator and output deflator, it turns out that the slowdown from the 1947-73 period to the post 1973 period is even larger than is generally recognized.
Furthermore, even in the period of the post-1995 acceleration �usable productivity� growth is still a full 1.2 percentage points below the 1947-73 average. It looks like we don�t have very much to show for a quarter century of trade liberalization, deregulation and union busting.
You can get the full story here.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved