The NYT reported on the likely passage of a new trade deal (wrongly described as "free-trade") with Peru. The article reports on President Bush's claim that increased trade has created jobs noting opponents' assertion that trade has cost jobs.
While some number of workers will lose their jobs due to trade and others will be employed in export sectors, the main effect of trade on workers comes through their impact on wages. The effect of recent trade deals has been to put the 70 percent of the workforce without college degrees in direct competition with low-paid workers in the developing world. More highly educated workers, like doctors, lawyers, economists, and reporters are still largely protected from this sort of competition. The predicted effect of this pattern of trade is to lower the relative wages of less educated workers, a pattern that has been widely documented over the last quarter century. It would have been useful to include this fact in the article.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. This month, we're trying to raise $50,000 to help fuel our election coverage, and we've fallen behind on reaching our goal. Any amount you give today will bring us closer to making our reporting possible—and a generous donor has agreed to match all online donations, so your impact will be doubled.
