That is what the WSJ should have been asking. It reports that stress test evaluate the solvency of banks: "even if the unemployment rate were to rise above 10% and home prices to fall by an additional 25%." This is far from a worse case scenario. With the unemployment rate at 8.5 percent, and the economy reportedly losing 660,000 jobs in March, the unemployment rate is almost certain to cross 10 percent before the end of the year. With house prices dropping by 2.0 percent per month, it is also very plausible that house prices will drop by 25 percent.
A stress test is supposed to examine a worse case scenario, not an optimistic one. By picking overly optimistic projections, Treasury increases the likelihood that banks will pass the stress test. This should have been noted in the article.
A second Trump administration will cement a right-wing majority on the Supreme Court for a generation, and put our collective future in the hands of someone who will be virtually unchecked by our institutions. The country has shifted rightward, and the reverberations will ensue for potentially the next few decades. In this climate, a robust independent media ecosystem will be more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on how Trump's agenda will actually affect the American people, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in this country.
Quality journalism is expensive to produce, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund what we do. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make our work possible. Any amount you give today will help us continue reporting on what matters to our democracy.
