The fraternity ritual of using totally meaningless numbers in budget stories is really running wild. Today the NYT discussed the stimulus package that Congress is considering for next year and never bothered to tell readers that the $400-$500 billion cost would be over the next two years.
Maybe NYT readers all knew that the spending would take place over two years, but I doubt this is the case. Of course, even if they did know that the spending would be over two years, it's unlikely that they really have a sense of how large this spending is relative to the budget or the economy. (The proposed package would be equal to between 7-8 percent of projected spending and 1.3-1.7 percent of GDP.)
It is really simple to express budget numbers in ways that are meaningful to readers. There is no excuse for not taking the 30 second necessary to do it.
[The Post is no better.]
Unlike many news organizations, the Prospect has remained staunchly committed to keeping our journalism free and accessible to all. We believe that independent journalism is crucial for a functioning democracy—but quality reporting comes at a cost. From Trump’s threat to the free press to Musk’s influence on our democracy, there is too much at stake in 2025 to stop now.
We’re behind on our goal to raise $75,000 to continue delivering the hard-hitting investigative journalism you’ve come to expect from us. Your support helps us maintain our independence and dig deeper into the stories that matter most.
We need you to make a year-end contribution today. Any amount helps secure our future and ensure we can continue holding power to account.
