The fraternity ritual of using totally meaningless numbers in budget stories is really running wild. Today the NYT discussed the stimulus package that Congress is considering for next year and never bothered to tell readers that the $400-$500 billion cost would be over the next two years. Maybe NYT readers all knew that the spending would take place over two years, but I doubt this is the case. Of course, even if they did know that the spending would be over two years, it's unlikely that they really have a sense of how large this spending is relative to the budget or the economy. (The proposed package would be equal to between 7-8 percent of projected spending and 1.3-1.7 percent of GDP.) It is really simple to express budget numbers in ways that are meaningful to readers. There is no excuse for not taking the 30 second necessary to do it. [The Post is no better.]
--Dean Baker