The Post headlined an article "Venezuelan Oil Losing Share of Key U.S. Market," with the implicit suggestion that this poses a serious problem for the Venezuelan oil industry. The data in the article don't quite fit the headline. The reason that Venezuela has lost market share over the last decade is that U.S. oil imports have risen by almost 50 percent, while Venezuela's exports have been almost flat.
In fact, since the main reason for rising imports has been declining domestic production, the share of Venezuelan oil in U.S. consumption has changed little over the last decade. I'm not sure that anyone in Venezuela is actively thinking of the impact of a cutoff of exports to the U.S. (obviously a cutoff would hurt both countries, but the U.S. can buy oil elsewhere and Venezuela can sell oil elsewhere), but since the relevant factor is the share of Venezuelan oil in U.S. consumption, not imports, the dependence of the U.S. on Venezuelan oil has not changed appreciably.
There's too much at stake this November for us to quit. As we navigate another presidential election year, thoughtful independent journalism is more important than ever. We're committed to bringing you the latest news on what's really happening across the country this election season, shining a light on the stories corporate media overlooks and keeping the public informed about how power really works in America.
Quality reporting doesn't come for free, and we don't have corporate backers to rely on to fund our work. Everything we do is thanks to our incredible community of readers, who chip in a few dollars at a time to make what we do possible. This month, we're trying to raise $50,000 to help fuel our election coverage, and we've fallen behind on reaching our goal. Any amount you give today will bring us closer to making our reporting possible—and a generous donor has agreed to match all online donations, so your impact will be doubled.
