That seems a reasonable question since it looks like the lobbyists might have writtenhttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/washington/30schumer.html?hp the story on Senator Schumer's support for keeping the fund manager tax break. Ar one point the article describes a bill that would subject the earnings of fund managers to the same tax schedule as that faced by other workers as a proposal that would "single out the industry with a plan that would more than double the taxes on the enormous profits reaped by its executives."
Later, it asserts that leading Democrats want to raise the tax rate on the fund managers' "investment gains." Of course this is not true. The issue is the tax rate that fund managers pay on the compensation they earn for managing funds. None of the bills being discussed would raise taxes on fund managers' income on money they actually invest in the fund.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today. For over 30 years, The American Prospect has delivered independent reporting that exposes corporate power, investigates political corruption, and analyzes threats to our democracy. Unlike many media outlets, we’re not owned by billionaires or corporations—we’re powered by readers like you.
Today’s independent journalism faces unprecedented challenges. Your support makes our reporting possible and keeps our work free and accessible to all. Whether it’s $5 or $50, every contribution helps sustain our nonprofit newsroom.
Join our community of supporters and make a donation today to help keep independent journalism thriving.
Copyright 2025 | The American Prospect, Inc. | All Rights Reserved